- Agents Unleashed
- Attention Must Be Paid
- Compression Algorithms
- Digital Cash 2nd Edition
- Digital Copyright Protection
- Disappearing Cryptography 1st Edition
- Disappearing Cryptography 2nd Edition
- Disappearing Cryptography 3rd Edition
- Free for All
- Future Ride
- How to Hide Online iPad App
- Java Beans Programming
- Java RAMBO Manifesto
- Policing Online Games
- Translucent Databases
A few weeks ago I started to think about revising my ten-year old book, Compression Algorithms for Real Programmers. Last year, I had a good deal of fun brushing some of the dust off of my book about steganography, Disappearing Cryptography and my book about privacy enhancing technology, Translucent Databases , so I started wondering if there were other books that were worth revitalizing.
The book about compression algorithms hasn't sold many copies lately, but I think the topic is still as useful for someone who needs a quick introduction. I tried to target the high-end programmers and the academics looking for an introduction to the topic and the result was a book that has been used as a textbook in simpler courses but also purchased by people in industry. While my heart has always been in the world of encryption, I've written a number of staples like this and the sales have always been good enough to make it almost worth my time.
When I started mousing around on the Internet, I found a few good reviews, a few negative ones, and what is best described politely as the ultimate complement: the book is a proud member of the pirated ISO "Great Science Textbooks DVD October 2008". Someone loved my book enough to scan it in and steal it.
I'm in good company. While I don't know my way around some of the areas of biology or chemistry, I saw the names of at least one Fields medalist in the list of authors. It's not everyday a man gets to share a list with a Fields medalist!
That's the good news. The bad news is that sales of the book are pretty much non-existant. Some people may have success giving their books away, but there was no boost since someone started "sharing" this file in 2007. Anyone who thinks that the stolen copies are good advertising is dreaming. Sales have dropped.
While others report reasonable results giving away free copies, I think the free copies aren't as responsible for any boost in sales as much as the publicity surrounding the free copies. It's the hype not the lack of cost that attract buyers. Getting this hype is much harder now that one person has done it.
The problem is going to become even more pronounced as the digital readers get better and better. I think most people buy legit copies of free books because it's cheaper than paying for the ink jet cartridges to print it out.
Alas, revitalizing a book like this isn't a simple process. Even though it's less work than writing a first draft, it's still very time consuming. I can't justify putting any time into creating another draft unless I'm going to earn something back. The heating bill needs to be paid. The idea of giving the book away and waiting for kind folks to buy a copy is such a long shot that I really can't justify it. Given that making the list of Great Science Textbooks didn't increase sales, I'm not going to take another chance until I find a better solution.
So I decided to ask my friends what I should do. Here are the options I can see:
I'm curious to hear what others think I should do. My guess is that this is a pretty crucial moment for society. While I'm very impressed with the quality of the knowledge in the Wikipedia, it's clear that the pilings are being knocked out of the people who synthesize information. One book publisher told me that his book hit the bittorrent networks within hours of appearing in digital form.
It's also clear that the brutal competition is not just hitting people like me. One person tried to tell me that society could rely upon professors with tenure to write books, but I haven't seen this lately. All of the tenured professors I know are frantically typing out grant applications. Their books were published years before they actually got tenure.
Indeed when I poke around, it's easy to find that many of the university courses are using either updated versions of old books or just plain old books. ( 1996 , 2003 , 1979-2006 .) The updates are certainly better than nothing, but one webpage for a classic textbook from the 1970s promises only that the new version includes "more detail" and "extensive exercises at various levels of difficulty at the end of each chapter". My updated versions aren't complete rewrites and I doubt that many of the books out there.
New textbooks seem to be pretty few and far between. Many courses like to just assign the latest research papers ( e.g. ),a solution that's certainly very current but comes without any consistency. Students need to shift gears to adjust to the slightly different nomenclature of each author and then they often need to reread the same material again and again because each author needs to reintroduce the topic again and again.
Student complain that textbooks cost too much and I certainly agree. Books easily cost more than $100 and some cost more than $200. While this sounds outrageous compared to a best seller, it's hard to make much money in this business even at that price. Very few books sell even 1000 copies and very few textbooks sell 100,000 copies.
The irony is that $100 is also much cheaper than a university course. Tuition can easily run $3,000 to $5,000 and a good text book usually comes with more material. While a text book doesn't come with office hours and TAs, it doesn't require transcribing a professor's hen scratching on the board. That makes it a great deal at $200.
I worry about our world's ability to synthesize the knowledge we need to make it easy to pass along information. There are fewer and fewer rewards for anyone who bothers to try to create even a semi-coherent introduction to a topic. The wikis are great but they have dangerous weaknesses. The pirates and the search engines are knocking out the foundations that built viable businesses. My books have always been far from perfect, but still they were better than nothing. If anyone has an idea, I would like to hear it.